Today’s review will be short, since the experimental is the simplest device without any show-off … There is another sub-system on the review. We look at Vaporesso Eco Nano. The review samples kindly provided the Healthcabin.net store. So let’s get started the Vaporesso ECO Nano Kit Review together!
- Dimensions: 77 x 44.7 x 18 mm
- Weight: 59.4 gr. Metal version/ 48.7 gr. Plastic version
- Building Material: Metal/Plastic
- Power: Built -in 1000 MAH
- Cartridge capacity: 6.0 ml
- Options resistance: 0.8 / 1.2 Ohms
- Protection: From low / high resistance, from overheating, from short circuit, from reloading / reloading
- Connector type: Magnetic
- Charging port / current: Type-C, charging current 1 ampere
- Eco Nano Battle
- Smooth cartridge 1 pc., 0.8 Ohm
- User guide
The manufacturer calls this device a “killer of one -time”. Let’s try to figure out why.
By the size of the box, you can immediately understand that this is a state employee.
A device arrives in an absolutely unpresentable tiny box made of uncontrolled cardboard (similar to transport boxes). The size of the box is really comparable to the box of some one-section. On the box, a sticker with the image of the device and the main chips, a hologram of originality verification. On the back, the characteristics of the kit, information about the manufacturer, warnings.
Inside the box is the device itself with a pre -installed cartridge and user guide. All. There is nothing more.
The device is available in two versions – metal and plastic. Flower options by the way as many as 14, 7 for each version. Metal ones have a more classic and strict color, but the plastic ones look more youth (except for three colors without a pattern). Also, the metal version is slightly harder. We have a metal version at the review.
The device itself is made in the form of a canister with smoothed corners. Outwardly, in view of simplicity, it looks really like one -section. There are no buttons on the case, the device works from tightening.
What was placed on the case? Yes, in fact, nothing. We see the logo of the company and the device itself. By the way, it can burn the LED indicator at the base with only one color (therefore, rely on your instinct, and more often charge the device, since the sudden category can take by surprise). We also see a charging port at the bottom of the device, which supports charging with an current of 1 ampere, which is, in principle, good. Given the budget and ecological orientation of the device, it could be even lower.
Battery capacity 1000 MAH. It is quite decent for the level of the device.
Let’s move on to the cartridge. And it is large and roomy, accommodates as much as 6 ml of liquid.
The cartridge includes only one. Cartridges go with an integrated evaporator, resistance options for now two – 0.8 and 1.2 Ohms. There are two contacts at the bottom of the cartridge, the air fence hole and two powerful magnets. There is no back on the cartridge on the battery block.
I really like the thunder, thin and flat, soar comfortably.
Access to refueling is standard, you need to remove the cartridge, open the scrap and refuel from below.
The manufacturer claims that the cartridges are made according to the new Corex technology, thanks to which the cartridge can withstand up to 13,000 puffs, or 24 ml of liquid. Of the latest Vaporesso products, I actively used the Xros 3 Nano, where stock cartridges were made using the same technology. And there the stock cartridge showed some kind of fantastic result that I myself would not have believed if someone told me. But he withstood almost 40 ml, and even continued to work further. But the cartridge, which was subsequently, apparently was from the old parties, and began to give a bar after 15 ml. Therefore, I think that ECO Nano should cope with the declared result.
Taste and puff: The tightening sensor works perfectly. No need to make special efforts to make a tightening. The puff is moderately tight, it is a pity that there is no adjustment, but in general it will go. I will call the taste a complete copy of the Xros, although it is not surprising. The taste is great.
Conclusions
And the conclusion is such a good and simple device that can be recommended. Only now, taking into account simplicity and kit, I can’t say that it turned out to be very budgetary. The plastic version costs in the region of $ 13, a metallic about 16 dollars. Perhaps a bit too much for such functionality and a set.
Pros
- appearance
- good taste
- It quality manufacturing
Minuses
- One ladies of LED indicator
- Lack of tightening adjustment
For the samples, thank you to the Healthcabin.net store.
Our friend pakholyuk has written an Russian review on ecigtalk, which is an Russian website, click to view original review there with more photos.
