Vaporesso Armour Max Review by pakholyuk

Logistics often spoils all plans. I wanted to make a review of today’s boxing, along with its younger version, but delivery, as always, disappointed. Recently, we looked at the Vaporesso Armor S Kit kit, today we look at the older two -cumulative version of Vaporeesso Armor Max Kit. Differences in versions are insignificant, and concern mainly nutrition and dimensions, but the conclusions from operation will differ.

For the provided sample huge thanks to the Healthcabin store.

A set in a dense cardboard box arrives in corporate black and green colors. On the box, traditionally information about the manufacturer, configuration and other information. Remove the casing and meet the tank, boxing, and dopes.

We will not stop at the Itank 2 tank, as the last time. It is unlikely that he will be interesting to someone.
I will leave a couple of key phrases about the tank: healthy, heavy, roomy, under large clouds, with a cooling system for opening the gas station.
In the tank, I see only one difference from the same tank from the version of Armor S Kit: in S version the tank was only with straight glasses, and silicone protection was designed for straight glass. In the Max version, the tank immediately goes with a “stuffy” glass, and the protection goes the same under it. There is no defense under the direct glass. And if in version S the defense sat tightly and immovable, then in the Max version she goes from side to side. In general, it got worse.
Well, I’ll leave a little photo.

Let’s immediately look at our thug Vaporesso Armor Max Mod.
Out ofland here completely repeats the features of the one -acting version of Armor S, but the dimensions naturally became larger. Indeed, against the background of S, the version of MAX looks more, but for some reason the weight increased by only 15-16 grams. Accordingly, when supplying both models to the batteries 21700, s version will weigh 252 gr., And Max version with 2 batteries will weigh 327 g. There is clearly a ball in favor of the Max version.

The boxmod is positioned as protected, for activities in the open air, but did you forget something important – water resistance? No, they didn’t hear.
The main materials of the case are plastic) and the metal frame. Although the boxmod is positioned as unknown, I think the paintwork there is typical for China, that is, mediocre. The Chinese paint is always a controversial moment.
As for the durability of painting, it’s hard to say something, time will tell.

The boxing is not compact from the word at all, but it is felt monolithic

The connector is made beautifully, Vaporesso always had everything great about it. The connector is a little bulging, so that the atomizer will not scratch the site. There is a lot of space on the context of the space, but there are fewer than the S version, the atomizers will sit up to 28 mm, since borders appeared on the sides.

On the front part we see a charging port, a small screen, buttons +-, as well as a Fire button, which, in addition to the main function, also knows how to move up and down, thereby becoming a lock lever. With a shift up, this key is blocking and the button is not pressed, the remaining buttons are not blocked.

The cover of the battery compartment is below. To get to the compartment, you need to press the button on the back of the boxmod. It’s easy to get to the compartment, as it will be easy to accidentally press the opening button. Therefore, the decision is dubious. In general, on the cover the moment is controversial: on the one hand it is convenient to open, on the other hand you can accidentally open, because it is enough just to press the button.

The buttons are comfortable, not clasping, but there is a complaint to the Fire button: if you press it on the top of it, then it simply does not press. It is necessary to press either to the center or to the lower part.
The management is very simple, there are only two key combinations:
“Up” + “down” – blocking the keys.
3 x Fire – entrance to the menu.

According to the operating modes, the Chinese once again decided to invent a bicycle. Varivatta mode for some reason was called f (t) mode, the Pulse Mode mode is something like varivont. Well, with Eco Mode, everything is clear, a typical non -proceeding, the regime for those who are sorry for the battery.

The screen is normal, color. It is quite bright, simple, well read. It is possible to configure brightness. The screen differs from the version of the version. If in version s the screen was an album orientation, then here it became book.

The boxmod is equipped with a Type-C entrance for charging, and according to the manufacturer’s statements, the possibility of charging 2 amperes current. Everything here became a little better, if the version of the version issued 1.2 amperes, then here is already about 1.65 amperes.

Let’s move on to the board. And the board works on the Axon chip. There is no unusual something, but the functionality for our time can even be said advanced, even there is a thermal control.
The scroll occurs with a step of 1 watt, of course I don’t really like it, but I think we will never see scrolling at 0.1 or 0.5 watts in boxes, everyone was abandoned.

In principle, there are no nit -picking fees in principle, but still I liked the old Omni chip more. And so in all modes shows itself well. There is no shortfight, Misfarers and delays also did not notice.
The discharge of the battery like all Vaporesso-3.30-3.33 V. vaporesso, cure this ancient jamb, this has been going on from 2017, you can discharge the battery to a lower value.

Conclusion: Oddly enough, with the general similarity of two models, the Max version was quite attracted to me. The weight was essentially not much more, and the profit was decently added. Yes, the dimensions have become more, but excuse me, this is still a twokkumnik. But from the S version, with its one battery and healthy dimensions, it was no sense to go here – nor MTL not to drive, nor the bulk does not really use the bulk. That’s how I would leave myself.

About price

The Russian market offers simply an inadequate price tag from 8 thousand rubles per set. If you look at China, then the Healthcabin site gives the price of $ 56.53, the main thing is not to forget to log in.

Pros

• Choal quality of materials and assembly
• Physical lock lever
• Available management
• Cliness of menu management
• Working
• This is a good screen
• Autonomy
• Snowly weight (for a two -cumulative device)

Nit -picking

• The capacity of switching only 1 watt
• Pinish opening of the battery cover
• Nuants with pressing the Fire button

Our friend pakholyuk has written an Russian review on ecigtalk, which is an Russian website, click to view original review there with more photos.