Vaporesso Armour Max Review by Petushkov

Today we analyze the current flagship of the VAPORESSO brand and part -time older brother of the Armour S Box Mod model observed last week. Many moments of devices are repeated, therefore, in an attempt to save your time, I will try to focus on the differences. So let’s get started the Vaporesso Armour Max Review together!

Only shops remain suppliers of Samlov – today healthcabin.net has advised. Manufacturers, as one, turned away from our brother. Most likely, “my activity” in the near future will come to naught…

We begin to get acquainted according to tradition from non -speech. This is a new submarine tank, which looks quite decent by the standards of such atomizers. As a decor, among other things, a silicone bumper is used. It is from breaking the flask that he will “hardly” protect, but from chips with light falls, but rather overturning.

The dimensions of the atomizer have impressive – both diameter and height are very decent. However, most of all I was confused by the weight – the tank can be compared with some single -tank boxing mods – it is too heavy. A simple plastic drip type is crowned with a simple plastic drip with a proprietary landing. In work, it is quite normal.

The top refueling – the lid opens by pressing the button – the spring -loaded mechanism shifts the latter to the side. The refueling hole is quite modest for such a verzila, it is covered with a silicone tangle of a slit type. In general, everything is worthy here – there is nothing to dig into exactly.

The capacity of the tank is not bad, but this state of affairs with straight glass. A magnifying sausage will bring this indicator to the impressive. However, the dimensions in this case will be as large as possible – the diameter of the whole 30 mm.

Replaceable evaporators here use GTI families. Two subside instances in the kit, which, according to tradition, are better cope with steam generation than with taste. However, they give out a normal average level of taste – I will not praise nor shu like that. I better note that they do not squish, and they do not allow leaks.

The adjustment of the intensity of the latter is regulated by a standard rotary ring at the base of the tank with a moderately tight move and stop. The tightening, of course, is almost the most long -free – noisiness is moderate.

Speed Maud thing is much more interesting. I won’t run in detail on the decor – because it is exactly copied in the younger version or vice versa. In general, the design, although overflowing with elements, but remains original – maybe even entertaining. But something else is interesting here – so if in a smaller version all this decoration is concentrated in a small area and looks concise / organically, then in the eldest it is as if smeared / stretched due to the larger width of the case. I’ll summarize here – if the smaller version is almost “laconic candy”, then a big is a decent gingerbread – Tula of course!)

We smoothly go to the dimensions – the use of the autonomous format of the battery naturally left its mark on the device. Boxing Mod turned out to be really huge – without exaggeration – in a word gingerbread (Tula which). However, ergonomics still did not suffer much – in general, this is normal – however, it is convenient to operate, as for me, it is conveniently with a thumb. Suddenly pleased the weight – the senior version is more heavier than the youngest by only 15g.

The materials used are all the same – basically it is plastic, which “provides” the anti -jet of the case – protection from moisture devices, I remind you, it does not have what is strange. However, here again there is metallic molding around the perimeter on both sides – in my opinion, such elements on the “outdo” should not be present. Moreover, to be located at the corners and faces – elements of the first contact when the device falls.

As in the case of a single -boker, with a landing was taken away. Aesthetic landing is provided only for atomizers with a diameter of 22.7mm. The site is ready to take 28mm atoms on board, moreover, hanging will also vary on each side-the fitting of parts is not identical. The metal platform still slightly protrudes from the corps, protecting the latter from scratches. Levitation is minimal.

The control panel is already familiar to us – everything that I already said in the last review is true for the flagship – therefore, there are some quotes further. “We go to the control panel – there is something to see here – a large activation button pulled all the attention. To begin with, it took on the plastic and took on, in addition to the above “load”, the blocking function. It is achieved by shifting the last down / up – the upper position of the start of the start, the lower active position. The option is amusing and very convenient – there was no arbitrary unlock, but! It seems to me that such a constructive will definitely “not add” the service life ” – I want and want to make a mistake – time will tell.”

“Otherwise, this is a pretty decent key with a small course, an average in elasticity by pressing and a pleasant click. Another thing is that the elasticity of this pressing is uneven in the perimeter – at the top it is very tight (there is almost no contact), the button rises obliquely at the bottom – by the way, that’s why I do not believe in its durability. The color display, the diagonal is standard, the design of the desktop is almost adequate – too colorful, as for me. The color scheme of the UI can be changed – however, only three shades are available, the brightness is customizable – normal in maximum mode. The settings of the settings are adequate – I have no complaints here. ”

The difference between the senior version is only a few points – the start button is even larger, now the entire surface is active for pressing, and the display changed the orientation, now stretched out in a horizontal plane. By the way, the charging current of the older model turned out to be more close to passport data – for the double -tanker, the result is quite worthy.

Access to the battery compartment also from the bottom – below the folding spring cover. All causal elements are made of metal – probably, I will not make complaints against it. The fixation button was more pleased – it is located on the side of the fashion – convenient, you know. Adapters for power supply elements are provided with the complete set.

The control chipset is identical to the predecessor with the only difference – the maximum power is increased to 220W. I was too lazy and did not take new photos, and I decided to duplicate the description of my impressions.

“The control chipset of its own development has undergone significant changes from my last acquaintance with the brand products. Probably the most “unpleasant” of them is the lack of classic varivatt. Yes, there are modes-“garbage” ECO, “incomprehensible to me” Pulse, “still miraculously practicing” f (t) and even thermal control for 3 most popular metals. In addition, there is a TCR Lock function, SMART option, puff counter and blocking settings. The latter, by the way, for some reason are not blocked by Faer slide.

As for the work, the device did not present any surprises – it is for the better – a normal average fee. It does not instill in power, it reads resistance with a minimum error, management is basically understandable. The battery charge is translated without numerical value, and the indicator is not so informative. ”

The differences between the versions here are less significant – it seemed to me that the double -bonom is more accurately read by the resistance, and the battery discharges to the value of a slightly smaller – 3.31V. However, here the indicator is not the most enviable.

Impression

For some reason, in the case of senior versions, I did not want to be so critical and sharp – only I am aging. And the senior version remains contradictory – “claims” from the first review “did not disappear” – then again the quote. “Anti -suggestion is“ lost ”with a metallic wound, increased autonomy pulls unjustified dimensions, the notorious blocking prophesies the inaccessibility of the structure of the activation button, etc. In short, for each plus there is a counterweight minus – and this I have not yet developed the topic. ”

For what you can “love” our hero – perhaps there is something. Firstly, the original appearance is not to you Aegis, which does not change the design from the moment of its first appearance. Secondly, this is a completely adequate control chipset and even without the usual varivatt. Thirdly, this, of course, is a price tag-they will ask for such an autonomous copy just.

Advantages

• Design
• Quality of execution and materials
• Relatively small weight
• Ergonomics (with reservations)
• Variability of the used nutritional elements
• Planting reserve (with reservations)
• Physical blocking of the activation button
• Anti -managerial case
• Fast charging
• Adequate work of the control chipset
• The capacity of the tank

Flaws

• Big box mod
• Gabarit and very heavy non -service
• Claims to the LKP of metal elements (IMHO)

Special thanks to the Healthcabin.net store for the sample provided

Petushkov, also named phouse has written an Russian review on ecigtalk, which is an Russian website, click to view original review.